Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional methods for offset measurements after total hip arthroplasty
Ferguson, RJ et al. Hip replacement. Lancet 392(10158), 1662–1671 (2018).
Google Scholar
Forde, B. et al. Restoration of the femoral offset is the most important technical factor in the prevention of total hip prosthesis dislocation. J. Orthop. 15(1), 131-133 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mahmood, SS, Mukka, SS, Crnalic, S., Wretenberg, P. & Sayed-Noor, AS Association between changes in global femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty and function, quality of life and strength abductor muscles: a prospective cohort study of 222 patients. Acta Orthop. 87(1), 36–41 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sariali, E., Klouche, S., Mouttet, A. & Pascal-Moussellard, H. The effect of modification of femoral offset on gait after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 85(2), 123-127 (2014).
Google Scholar
McGrory, BJ, Morrey, BF, Cahalan, TD, An, KN, and Cabanela, ME Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone joint surgery. Br. 77(6), 865–869 (1995).
Google Scholar
Asayama, I., Chamnongkich, S., Simpson, KJ, Kinsey, TL, and Mahoney, OM Reconstructs hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip replacement surgery. J. Arthroplasty. 20(4), 414–420 (2005).
Google Scholar
Little, NJ, Busch, CA, Gallagher, JA, Rorabeck, CH & Bourne, RB Polyethylene acetabular wear and acetabular tilt and femoral offset. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 467(11), 2895–2900 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sakalkale, DP, Sharkey, PF, Eng, K., Hozack, WJ & Rothman, RH Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 388125-134 (2001).
Google Scholar
Clement, ND, Patrick-Patel, RS, MacDonald, D. & Breusch, SJ Total hip arthroplasty: increasing femoral offset improves functional outcomes. Camber. Orthop. Trauma surgery. 136(9), 1317-1323 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dastane, M., Dorr, LD, Tarwala, R. & Wan, Z. Hip offset in total hip arthroplasty: quantitative measurement with navigation. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 469(2), 429–436 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ellapparadja, P., Mahajan, V., Deakin, AH & Deep, K. Reproduction of hip offset and leg length in total hip arthroplasty with navigation: How accurate are we?. J. Arthroplasty. 30(6), 1002–1007 (2015).
Google Scholar
Enke, O., Levy, YD & Bruce, WJ Accuracy of restoration of leg length and femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty with the use of an intraoperative calibration gauge. Hip Int. 30(3), 296–302 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pasquier, G. et al. Measurement of total hip arthroplasty offset: is CT the most accurate option? Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 96(4), 367–375 (2010).
Google Scholar
Lazennec, JY, Brusson, A., Dominique, F., Rousseau, MA & Pour, AE Offset and anteversion reconstruction after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty: an evaluation with the low-dose EOS system comparing imaging two-dimensional and three-dimensional. Int. Orthop. 39(7), 1259-1267 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sariali, E., Mouttet, A., Pasquier, G., Durante, E. & Catone, Y. Accuracy of hip reconstruction using computerized three-dimensional preoperative planning and cementless modular collar . J. Bone joint surgery. Br. 91(3), 333–340 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sariali, E., Boukhelifa, N., Catonne, Y., and Pascal Moussellard, H. Comparison of planning-assisted and conventional three-dimensional positioning of the acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J. Bone joint surgery. A m. 98(2), 108-116 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bayraktar, V. et al. Accuracy of measurement of the position of the acetabular cup after total hip arthroplasty: Comparison between radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography. Int. Orthop. 41(4), 731–738 (2017).
Google Scholar
Inoue, D. et al. Interest of three-dimensional surgical preoperative planning software based on computed tomography in total hip arthroplasty with developmental hip dysplasia. J. Orthop. Science. 20(2), 340–346 (2015).
Google Scholar
Flecher, X., Ollivier, M. & Argenson, JN Length and offset of the lower limbs in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 102(1 suppl.), S9-20 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kanda, Y. Survey of the free and easy-to-use “EZR” software for medical statistics. Bone marrow transplant. 48(3), 452–458 (2013).
Google Scholar
Landis, JR & Koch, GG The measure of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1), 159–174 (1977).
Google Scholar
Jingushi, S. et al. Multiinstitutional epidemiological study concerning hip osteoarthritis in Japan. J. Orthop. Science. 15(5), 626–631 (2010).
Google Scholar
Sanchez-Sotelo, J., Berry, DJ, Trousdale, RT & Cabanela, ME Surgical Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Adults: II Arthroplasty Options. Jam. Acad. Orthop. Surg. ten(5), 334–344 (2002).
Google Scholar
Takao, M. et al. Results of a press-fit-only technique for acetabular fixation in hip dysplasia. J. Arthroplasty. 26(4), 562–568 (2011).
Google Scholar
Eggli, S., Pisan, M. & Müller, ME The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone joint surgery. Br. 80(3), 382–390 (1998).
Google Scholar
Knight, JL & Atwater, RD Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty Quantifying its usefulness and accuracy. J. Arthroplasty. seven(Supp.), 403–409 (1992).
Google Scholar
Chen, X. et al. Revision acetabular prosthesis based on three-dimensional reconstruction technology using jumbo cups. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. ten799443 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hou, Y. et al. Postoperative position of the center of the hip associated with the range of internal rotation and extension during gait in patients with hip dysplasia after total hip arthroplasty. Before Bioeng. Biotechnol. ten831647 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bicanic, G., Delimar, D., Delimar, M. & Pecina, M. Influence of acetabular cup position on hip loading during arthroplasty in hip dysplasia. Int. Orthop. 33(2), 397–402 (2009).
Google Scholar
Bonnin, MP, Archbold, PH, Basiglini, L., Selmi, TA & Beverland, DE Should the acetabular cup be medialized in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 21(4), 428–435 (2011).
Google Scholar
Archbold, Ha et al. The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid in the orientation of the acetabular component during a primary total hip prosthesis: a preliminary study of 1000 cases relating to postoperative stability. J. Bone joint surgery. Br. 88(7), 883–886 (2006).
Google Scholar
Kurtz, WB, Ecker, TM, Reichmann, WM & Murphy, SB Factors affecting bone impingement in hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 25(4), 624-634.e1–2 (2010).
Google Scholar
Lecerf, G. et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, evaluation, implications for preoperative modeling and hip arthroplasty. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 95(3), 210-219 (2009).
Google Scholar
Argenson, J.N. et al. Three-dimensional anatomy of the hip in osteoarthritis after developmental dysplasia. J. Bone joint surgery. Br. 87(9), 1192-1196 (2005).
Google Scholar
Weber, M. et al. Plain radiographs do not reflect femoral offset in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 29(8), 1661–1665 (2014).
Google Scholar
Brenner, DJ & Hall, EJ Computed tomography–a growing source of radiation exposure. N.Engl. J.Med. 357(22), 2277-2284 (2007).
Google Scholar